Part 2: Archeology says Mecca was no major mercantile center of 6th & 7th Centuries

The Year 536 C.E. changed Planet Earth & humanity. 

 

It would not be business as usual, for the next 124 years.  

It became easy to infringe upon existing empires and start new ones.

The first impediment to the credibility of the "major trading hub" narration about 6th Century Mecca ... or even 7th Century Mecca ... is that a major environmental disaster occurred on a Global Scale, in the 6th Century.  

The year was 536 C.E.  It resulted in the Late Antique Little Ice Age which lasted until 660 C.E.  It involved three major volcanic outbursts which provided a massive amount of atmospheric Sulfur Dioxide.  Sulfur Dioxide molecules, per se, serve the function of many mirrors reflecting sunlight back into outer space, not enabling enough sunlight to reach the surface of the Earth.

The environmental disaster of the 6th Century also included the Justinian Plague which started in 541 C.E.  It then recurred throughout a 225 year time span.  In fact, exactly one hundred years later, Alexandria Egypt would fall at the hands of Arabian swordsmen imposing a new religion with their swords.  

In addition, it was exactly one year after the Late Antique Little Ice Age ended, when the first Muslim empire began.  It was called the Amayyad Caliphate.  It lasted until 750 C.E., and it ended up being the fifth largest empire in human history, in having covered 4.29 million square miles of land.  

In the Sixth and Seventh Centuries, humanity weakened.  Civilization was wanting, and thusly, civilization was wanning.  The time was ripe for nomads to literally come out of the desert and start thrashing at existing empires.  

As a result, the Sasanian Empire of Persia was toppled in the 630s.  In fact, the Byzantine Empire lost Syria also ... to a desert horde which originally called its members "believers."  By the Year 641 C.E.,  Alexandria was no longer a Christian city.  Yet, a significant remnant of the Byzantine Empire would remain until 1453 C.E.

All in all, the establishment of any new religion during this era would have been the result of Environmental & Economic Opportunism more than the providence of an Eternal God.  Mankind was hurting.  Civilization was wanning.  Conquest during this time span was basically "easy pickings."  The 6th and 7th Centuries was a time span when the literal survival of humanity was in jeopardy.

The archeologically proven or disproven existence of Mecca as a major trading hub is the Tale of the Tape 

If there had been no major trading center in Mecca during the 6th and 7th Centuries ... and if there are no archeological signs of any civilization ... then mass geographic regions of humanity were told one big lie, for 1,400 years.

Such a thing is not fair to those people, be they in Indonesia or Afghanistan or Persia or Iraq or Pakistan or Turkmenistan or Uzbekistan or Azerbaijan or Türkiye or Syria or Egypt or Jordan or Arabia or Yemen or even the city of Minneapolis Minnesota, otherwise known as New Somalia.  

Furthermore, such a thing is certainly not fair to the Jews who have had a target painted on them, by the Mullahs and other religious fanatics who have proven themselves to have no conscience or compassion.  Mass populations of mankind deserve better than the tyranny of the mullahs.

Directly above:  United States' NASA satellite technology  showing Mecca
as a dry, parched, desert land not capable of hosting a large society
or a major trading center during an era of 1] primitive technology,
2] an era of a mini ice age, and 3] an era of a massive plague.

Concerning the Hatred of the Jews, this Arabian man who was alleged to have existed in the 7th Century was alleged to have had a JEWISH WIFE, named Safiyya bint Huyayy.  She was said to have been his tenth wife, and thusly, a "Mother of Believers."   Yet, the mullahs claim that you have to kill all Jews in the name of the man who had a Jewish wife.

Mohammad was said to have had 11 wives, in all.  One was said to have been nine years old, upon marriage.  And yes, this is one of the reasons why Americans use the phrase, "You've got to be kidding," as the phrase, "Okay.  Joke's over."

Quick Mecca Geography Note

Now, there is a cemetery near the famous Muslim mosque of Mecca.  It's called, the Jannat al-Mu'alla Cemetery.  In fact, it's alleged inhabitants include Kadijah bint Khuwaylid, a woman said to have been the first wife of Mohammad.  In fact, she is regarded as the first convert to Islam and a "Mother of Believers."

A grandfather and an uncle of Mohammad are said to be there also, assuming that Mohammad actually did exist, at least as a warlord whose story was later embellished for political influence and cultural gain.  In fact, Mohammad's first son and a companion of Mohammad are both alleged to be there.

The huge problem with these claims is that there are no artifacts or any other kind of archeological evidence to prove who is and who is not there.  Any remaining pieces of evidence were removed from the Jannat cemetery in 1925.  From that point onward, humanity was unable to prove or disprove the hearsay assertions of that cemetery.

No Major 6th or 7th Century Trading Center in Mecca

The much larger problem is that of proving Mecca to have been a massively frequented & influential trading center of the 6th & 7th Centuries.  The physical evidence for this assertion does NOT exist.

Medina

Medina is also a part of the Muslim narrative, concerning the claim that a man born and raised in Mecca was given numerous revelations from the Archangel Gabriel, starting at the age of 40 and ending in the year of his alleged death, at the age of 62.  

This same man was said to have eventually moved to Medina, where he eventually made a move on Medina, itself.  It was said to have resulted in the Medina Constitution of 622 or 624 C.E.  

That constitution allowed Jews to live alongside Muslims, and to even have a defense pact with the Medina Muslims, in the event of a foreign invasion.

Then came 628 C.E., when it was alleged that a Battle in Kaybar ...,  located 109 north of Medina ... occurred.  This was a political and religious shape shifter, in that the enemies of the man named Mohammad, in this alleged battle, were Jews.  The Year 628 C.E. was the year of the start of severe Muslim hatred of the Jews, allegedly.

HOWEVER, Moorish Muslims mostly tolerated Jews and Christians in Spain for centuries, during the centuries when Spain was called Al-Andalusa ... or Andalusia.   Seething anti-Jewish hatred was NOT there.

Of course, Jews and Christians were classified as dhimmis, aka second class citizens.  There were pockets of time when degrees of prejudice and even persecution transpired against the very human dhimmis, by the Moors.  But, the entire annihilation of the Jews was not sought by the Moorish Muslims.

Kaybar

Concerning the claim of there having been a battle in Kaybar Arabia in 628 C.E., there is no physical, archeological, and/or artifact-related evidence for any such battle ... and there is no archeological evidence that Jews settled there.

                             ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛

Now, the place was an oasis and there were fortlike structures near and around the area.   Thus, one such structure is referred to as the "abandoned" Jewish Fortress of QAMOS, allegedly manned by the Banu Nadir Jews.  But, no Jewish artifacts from the area are known to be in any museum or university warehouse.  

And remember, concerning any written account about any subject, such a thing can possibly be a script of lies ... hoaxes ... falsehoods ... misinterpretations, propaganda, honest mistakes, and even dishonest writings motivated by Conflict of Interest.

The prejudicial factor to this Kaybar story is that it was alleged that Mohammad ... the military leader who attacked the Jews ... was claimed to have been poisoned shortly after the battle, by a Jewish lady, via dinner.   Such a story is a great way to create hatred toward the Jews.

HOWEVER, it was alleged throughout 1,400 years that this Mohammad didn't die until three and a half years after having eaten one and only one poisoned dinner, prepared by a Jewish woman.

Now, who would be foolish enough to eat anything provided by a subdued enemy member, shortly after any victorious battle over that enemy?  Hello?  

The Iranian Mullahs are the Adolph Hitlers of Today

None the less, those particular Muslim sects which claim that you have to kill all the Jews for Allah are nothing more than a bunch of Adolph Hitlers walking around in bishts and tunics.  And you know how Adolph's story ended.

The Attila Similarity

In fact, in 453 C.E., it was suspected that the brutal Attila the Hun was poisoned to death by his fifth wife, Ildico.  This is because he died a graphic death on his & his fifth wife's wedding night.  

Well, Attila the Hun's newest wife happened to have been a member of a conquered community.  Thus, Attila should have expected the existence of something known as hostility, along with resentment, as well as vengeance.

Attila was a fool for taking that woman as his wife.  On his wedding night, Attila underwent hemorrhaging.  He literally had a non-stoppable nose bleed.  He died that night.  Thus, it was a super suspicious death.  

If a Mohammad really did exist ... or if there existed at least a common warlord whose life was later embellished ... and if there were a Battle of Kaybar in 628 ... then it was beyond idiotic for this Mohammad to have eaten anything prepared by a recently conquered enemy, whether she were Jewish or not.  

Not knowing that he would be poisoned by such a person would show that this military leader of 628 C.E. was no prophet.  If he were a prophet, he would have known that a Jewish lady was putting poison into his food.

In comparison, there was St. Benedict of Nursia

In contrast, Roman Catholic monk & validly ordained priest, Saint Benedict, was handed a chalice filled with a poisoned drink.  This occurred in the presence of a number of fellow monks who became instant witnesses to what would instantly follow.  St. Benedict allegedly made the sign of the Cross in front of the chalice, and the chalice allegedly shattered, saving Benedict from being poisoned to death.  

Oh, Saint Benedict did have nay-saying enemies, not alike the Donald Trump who was physically grazed by an attempted assassin's bullet. 

Medina in the 7th Century

Now, Medina certainly did exist.  HOWEVER, Medina is actually 211 straight-line miles from Mecca, and it takes 273 road miles to go from Mecca to Medina.  Therefore, simply because Medina existed in the 7th Century, it doesn't guarantee that Mecca existed as a major trading hub.

For comparison purposes, the distance between Mecca and Medina is similar to the distance between Pittsburgh and Detroit, as well as Pittsburgh and Baltimore.  In fact, 211 miles is close to the distance between Newark, New Jersey and Washington D.C.  In the days without motor cars and airplanes, 211 miles was a significant distance, consuming 5 to 10 days of travel time.

Now, the year when the Muslim religion really took flight was in 633 C.E., beginning with Persian, as well as Iraq's Kufa, and the other Middle Eastern strongholds of the Byzantine Empire.  This included the Damascus Syria which was going to become the first Muslim empire capital in world history, come 661 C.E.

Numerous MUSLIM invasions of numerous non-muslim lands ensued throughout the centuries, in the name of Allah, where the conquered People were to submit or to die.  Sometimes the attacked people fought back and won.  

In as much below is a sample of battles won by Catholic forces over Muslims forces, and none of the battles posted below were "Crusade Battles."

The battles where Christians successfully defended themselves from marauding Muslims included the 732 Battle of Tours, the 801 Siege of Barcelona Spain,  the 1063 Battle of Graus Spain,  the 1085 Siege of Toledo Spain,  the 1094 Capture of Valencia Spain, ...

... as well as the 1456 Siege of Belgrade, the 1529 First Siege of Vienna,  the 1565 Great Siege of Malta,  the 1571 Battle of Lepanto, the 1572 Battle of Molodi,  the 1593 Battle of Sisak,   the 1673 Battle of Khotyn,  the 1683 Second Siege of Vienna, as well as the 1686 Siege of Buda.  This subject matter is posted elsewhere on the Blue Marble Album.  

Now, when it comes to detailing 1,400 years of Muslim History, there is a lot of writing and illustrating to be done.  But, you at least have a starting gate text here and an introductory text there, along with some politely-done  YouTube videos, etc, etc, etc.

Such videos and texts are not meant to mock or condemn.  They are meant to guide ... to enlighten ... to warn ... and to inform those who have been deprived of needed news and needed history books throughout their oppressed lives.

Your Ultimate Reality Check,  America.

Concerning the up-to-date findings on the subject-at-hand, be polite.  Don't be obnoxious about it, and don't go burning a Quran.  You need a Quran for evidence purposes and for mature debate.  Instead of being feisty, enjoy feeling liberated at learning the actual truth on the matter at hand, and then share that sense of liberation, along with the information that made you experience a sense of freedom.  

Simply do NOT be anyone's fool, and don't let political operatives bully you or anyone else into submission, on any subject, including religion.  

You need to first be allowed to make an assessment of a religion, of a political party, of a philosophy, of a job, of a movie script, of a way of life, of a motor vehicle to be purchased, etc, etc, etc.  You need to be allowed to shop-around, to browse, to evaluate.

You need to be first allowed to think things out ... to be given time to read on the matter ... to look at photos ... to hear of the accounts of the forerunners of a religion or a political party or a form of art or form of thought involved.   You need to read proverbial "customer reviews."

You also need to understand the purpose of this religion here and that religion there ... this philosophy here and that philosophy there ... etc, etc, etc.  This is the opposite of having a religion shoved down your throat at the barrel of a rifle, in the name of Allah.

Even your preference of music is your choice alone, no matter what the so-called-cool-guys tell you is the music you must purchase.  Those guys have to prove themselves to you.  You do not have to prove yourself to them.  After all, they are basically power-hungry narcissists.  

Consider yourself in the Narcissist-free zone.  So, look, comprehend, and perceive ... and be excellent to others.  Always be excellent to others:

https://medium.com/@spotlightonislam2/the-missing-city-why-the-mecca-of-islamic-tradition-did-not-exist-in-the-7th-century-b94471692ce3

⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛  ⛛

https://medium.com/@7thcenturyislamdebunked/mecca-in-the-7th-century-e2f886771c14

Note for the text below:  Dhows were sail boats with triangular sails.

The link to Part 1 can be found through the link below

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2026/04/no-major-trading-center.html

Part 1: Archeology says Mecca was no major merchant center in 6th & 7th Centuries

The center of the Muslim religion is Mecca.  Mecca is also known as Makkah al-Mukarramah ... as well as Macoraba ... and even Bakkah.  Yes, different names for the same one place.

Mecca was said to have been a major trading center during the 6th and 7th Centuries.  This "Mecca trading center" narrative is a pivotal assertion for the Muslim religion.  This is because the Muslim religion professes that its founder predominately lived in Mecca, from 570 to 622 C.E.  The Muslim religion furthermore professes that this man was a very rich merchant in very rich Mecca with a very rich wife.

Now, as far as goes MAJOR trading hubs in the history of the Eastern Hemisphere, the Operative Phrase is =====>  THE SILK ROUTE ... The Silk Road ... and more specifically, the Maritime Silk Road.  In as much, whatever be the 6th Century city, if it were not located along the Maritime Silk Road, it was NOT a major trading hub.

It turns out that the Story of Mecca was just a story

Mecca was nowhere near the Silk Route which began in Xi'an China and which ended in Antakya, Türkiye.  In fact, Antakya is approximately 1,000 miles north of Mecca.  Moreover, Alexandria Egypt was also a major trading hub along the Maritime Silk Road, and it's located 911 miles northwest of Mecca.

JEDDAH

For those unaware, 41 miles west of Mecca is a port town which bares the name "Grandmother" or "Ancestress" in Arabic.  This is because an Islamic writer of the early 10th Century claimed that Eve was buried there, in a tomb.  Well, there was some kind of a tomb there which was destroyed by the Saudi government, in 1928, under the claim that it incited idolatry.

None the less, after a wave of Muslim conquests ... in 647 ... Jeddah's name became "the City of Consulates," as in Balad al-Qanasil.  So, it was the city with two interchangeable names.

As far as goes Jeddah, in the 6th Century and until 647 C.E., Jeddah was only a FISHING PORT which provided no accommodations for merchant caravans.  This reinforces the findings that Mecca was not a major trading center in the 6th and 7th Centuries.

Until 647 C.E., the Port of Jeddah was Persona Non Grata.  It then became designated to be the port for those making pilgrimages to the Great Mosque of Mecca.  The Great Mosque of Mecca was known as Masjid al-Haram.  The person designating Jeddah as the pilgrim's port was Caliph Uthman ibn Affan.  

In as much, the Arabian word, Masjid, means place to prostrate oneself, as in prostrating oneself before God's presence.  Something similar to that.  But, the bottom line here is that neither Mecca nor Jeddah were major merchant centers in the 6th & 7th Centuries.  

There was also historic Baghdad.  One of its suburbs 21 miles away was the major 7th Century trading hub located along the Maritime Silk Road.  It's located 850 to 900 miles north of Mecca.  None the less, during the 8th Century, Baghdad was the major trading center of the region.  Baghdad is 869 miles away from Mecca.

In addition, Hormuz Island and the city of Hormuz itself is situated 1,200 miles northeast of Mecca.  Hormuz, too, was one of the major trading hubs of the Maritime Silk Road.  Meanwhile, Mecca was not.

In addition, Mecca is about 45 miles east of the Red Sea.  HOWEVER, the main 7th Century Red Sea port was Berenice Troglodytica.  It was a Greco-Roman port on the Egyptian side of the Red Sea ... and NOT on the Arabian side.  And, as the name suggests, Troglodytica means "cave dwellers," as opposed to desert nomads.

Below:  As far as goes the history of Alexandria Egypt, it was the major Middle Eastern & Mediterranean trading hub of the 6th Century.  Well, Muslim tradition states that a man named Mohammad started his rise to wealth at the end of the 6th Century, due to Mecca Commerce.  He would then become fully wealthy at the start of the 7th Century ... due to Mecca commerce when the reality is that Alexandria was the place to get rich.

Alexandria remained a major trading hub into the first four decades of the 7th Century.  Then, in 641 C.E., nineteen years after the man named Muhammad was said to have died, Alexandria was conquered by Arabian forces.  It's economic dominance in the region was no more.  However, throughout the alleged lifetime of the man named Muhammad,  Alexandria was a major trading hub.  This meant that Mecca was not.

In review:  A caravan of camels could NOT survive the journey to the real trading hub, Alexandria.  Plus, they could not swim across the Red Sea, to the port town of Berenice Troglodytica.  

The disaster of having a herd of pack animals travel long distances was already illustrated in the person of Hannibal and his  Column of 37 War Elephants, in 218 BCE.  A grand total of one elephant made it through the Pyrenees and the Alps, into Capua.  Capua is a suburb of Caserta which is a suburb of Naples.

Concerning the claim that Mecca was the ultimate trading hub of the 6th and/or 7th Century, the logistics do NOT work, and the evidence is just NOT there ... or anywhere else.  Even Baghdad, the major Silk Route hub nearest to Mecca, is 869 miles north north north of Mecca.  And of course, Baghdad is a legend of a city.

Let's get this well understood and review it

Now, in the list of Maritime Silk Road trading centers, one city is always missing from the list, concerning historical accounts, merchant records, and archeological evidence.  In as much, in records and chronicles of the 6th and 7th Century, neither Mecca nor Makkah al-Mukarramah nor Macoraba nor Bekkah are ever mentioned as major centers of the Maritime Silk Road.

The Muslim tradition of claiming that a Mohammad made a fortune in Mecca from the very late 500s into the early 600s has zero credibility to it.  

Let's review this one more time, due to the brain-washing that occurred by certain media entities, educational entities, and nations where the freedom of one's choice of religion is forbidden:

1]  Wealthy Eastern Hemispheric merchants of the era operated in either Hormuz or Alexandria or Baghdad or Antakya or Calicut India or a few other places, all of which were either on the Maritime Silk Road or were port towns. 

2] The wealthy merchants did NOT operate in Mecca, be it under the name of Mecca or under the name of Bekkah ... or under the name of Makkah al-Kamarramah ... or under the name Macoraba.  Plus, Jeddah was not a major trading port, either.  It was a modest fisherman's port.

3]  Therefore, all four names for Mecca were absent from the records and from chronicle accounts, as well as archeological inscriptions of any kind, for centuries.  Meanwhile, in the years before the Muslim conquest of the Arabian regions, Jeddah was part of the Kingdom of Hejaz, ruled by Hashemite Dynasty. 

Part 2 can be found through the link below:

https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2026/04/no-major-trading-center-part2.html

Part 1 of Ilhan Omar, the privileged daughter of a military officer, during a genocide

... where her father was on the offending side.

Targeted & killed were 60,000 to 200,000 Isaaqs.

Ilhan was not and is not an Isaaq.  Her side was the killer side.

In re:  Ilhan Omar, the JIHAD JO of her generation.

Purpose:   This post is in response to Ilhan Omar having accepted the invitation to go on camera ... and then to go on the record ... telling humanity that the White Male is so evil that mankind must ostracize the White Man from the very society that he constructed.

In defense of the chronically defamed white male:

The world of the white male, incidentally, included the ~abolition of slavery and ~affirmative action, as well as compulsory ~Equal Opportunity Employment practices throughout a nation the size of the Sahara landmass.

The world of the White Man also brought forth ~Freedom of Speech, ~Freedom of Religion, ~Freedom of the Press, ~Freedom to travel across state lines without passport or visa, the ~Right to Petition the government, and the ~Right to PEACEFULLY Assemble ... 

... without blowing whistles in law enforcement officers' ears and without hitting law enforcement officers with your SUV ... without blocking traffic ... and also without doxing law enforcement officers who are executing writs and administrative law judge orders.

The ~Magna Carta was also a white guy's innovation.  So, too, was the 930 C.E. establishment of Iceland's parliament, known as the ~Alþingi.  So, how about you hate-filled activists out there cool it with the obsessive demonizing of the White Male, especially the working white male who made your lives push-button easy.

Concerning this, the White Male's World brought forth pasteurization, the small pox vaccine, the tetanus vaccine, and the polio vaccine.  So, while the Muslim man was out "killing infidels" every time he could do so, the white male was trying to save as many lives as he could.

In fact, it was the White Male who effectively ended the reoccurrence of Cholera Epidemics, on a global scale.

Let us begin with the Ballad of Evil Ilhan, worthless piece of trash:

At the outset of this post, it must be illustrated that the Muslim Religion in Iran has been severely dissolving into waves of indifference & disinterest, as well as resentment & discontent.

The stat above was reported as such in 2023, by Ayatollah Mohammad Abolghassem

The aforementioned statistic is extremely important, in light of the stereotypical Democrat Party Propaganda against the non-politician businessman, Donald Trump.  Today's mainstream media aired the CONTRIVED street marches of Pro-Islam Iran, stating that the Iranians loved their brutal & murderous dictator ... and how much they'll stand by their Islamic Religion which was imposed upon them, at the edge of 7th Century swords, under penalty of death.  

Well, the UNDENIABLE FACT is that 50,000 mosques in recent years have completely closed-down due to lack of attendance.  This means that twice as many Iranian mosques closed-down than stayed open. Therefore, a large number of Iranians are NOT NOT NOT standing by the state-mandated religion that was shoved down the Persians' throats, as far back as the 7th Century, C.E.

Ayatollah-based Iran is a government who killed more than 32,000 of its own citizens in two days.  Thus, those specific pro-Ayatollah street marchers were in front of cameras praising the regime, in fear of becoming part of the next 32,000 citizens to be killed by order of the ruling mullahs.   End of Prelim Statement.

📉     📉     📉     📉     📉     📉     📉

Preview:  Ilhan Omar's father was a highly ranked Somali officer, during the Hargeisa Holocaust.  This genocide included the bombardment of the City of Burao which became 70% rubble.  

Of course, in front of American TV cameras, Ilhan would repeatedly say, "As one who witnessed the horrors of war, ..." as if she were the helpless martyr, running from shelter to shelter, dodging explosions & gunfire.  The reality was that Ilhan was on the side committing the horrors of war!!!  

Ilhan was no martyr.  When the opposing side of the Somalian Conflict got the upper-hand in Somalia, she was conveniently swept away, into Kenya.  She was then welcomed into the United States whose roots were certainly WHITE & CHRISTIAN, as well as White Deist, and even white agnostic ... as of 1787.

Genocide in Somalia

The Isaaq Genocide heavily benefitted Ilhan Omar's side of the Somali Power Debate, and it was something not kept a secret from her highly ranking father.  Yet, it was sophomorically declared by the predictably deceitful Democrat Party Operatives that it's possible that he didn't know about it.  You can't be serious.

When bombing raids turn 70% of a city into the craters of the Moon, it's not a secret.  Thus, Omar's father absolutely KNEW that it was occurring, thereby consigning to him accountability for the Isaaq Genocide, at least as a compliant accomplice or as an accessory after the fact, if not a direct commander of the mass killings, themselves.

Oh waiter!!!  Reality check on Ilhan Omar, please.

Ilhan seeks to have the White Male ostracized from the very infrastructure that he predominately built with his architects & draftsmen ... both literally & proverbially.  This infrastructure is due to his years of disciplined school attendance and work attendance, as well as his vision and creativity ... his many inventions ... and the financial risks he had to take, in addition to the negotiating he had to do.   

It's an insult to consider that Omar's targeted political opponent is the White Male, in light of the fact that it was the white Christian male who was kind enough to let the ungrateful Ilhan Omar into the United States, in the first place.  

It was the society formed by the white male which saved Omar's life from some Muslim warlord somewhere near the Horn of Africa.  After all, the U.N. and NATO were founded by white guys.

The genocide which heavily benefitted Ilhan's side.

As a reality check, Ilhan Omar is the daughter of a colonel, now deceased, who was heavily in charge of a nation's military that was heavily engaged in a GENOCIDE.  The specific genocide was/is known as the Hargeisa Holocaust.  

That genocide literally turned the City of Burao into 70% rubble with Soviet Il-28 Beagles & MiG-21's.  However, at the time, the USA, under Ronald Reagan, was the super power generously funding the Somali government.  The Isaaqs had zero aircraft with which to fight-back.  Burao was a shooting gallery.

There were 60,000 to 200,000 Isaaqs killed by the Somalis, under the accusation that the Isaaqs were Jews.  However, their DNA was Arabian, instead.

Below:  It's presented to you as ALLEGEDLY.  But, it was more like APPARENTLY.  None the less, that which is 100,000% certain is that Ilhan Omar lived a privileged life, on the side of the mass murdering Somali regime.

https://www.somalilandchronicle.com/2025/07/25/ilhan-omars-father-and-the-isaaq-genocide-the-truth-revealed/

★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★

As was previously stated, the greatest irony here is that the Siad Barre Government of Somalia was financially supported by none other than ====> the United States government.  More specifically, by ====> the US taxpayer.  

Yes, the United States taxpayer unwittingly supported a genocide.  In fact, chances are that the US taxpayer paid the salary of Ilhan Omar's father.  If the US taxpayer didn't pay his salary, then who in Somalia could have afforded to have done so?  

Now, the US taxpayer was/is predominately white ... especially in decades past.  This means that the WHITE United States taxpayer paid Ilhan's way, even when she was in Somalia.  The White Man whom she despises has been helping her all along.

Moreover, you need to understand that the REAGAN ADMINISTRATION was a very compromising government that would have sold America to the Devil, IF the Devil promised to keep Russian communism out of American affairs.  Such a thing is known as being a SELLOUT GOVERNMENT, concerning ethics & morality.

In as much, when Bush the First became president in 1989, the Berlin Wall was turned into a museum piece.  Funding Somalia was no longer needed.  So, the funding of Somalia significantly diminished.  

In early 1991, the Siad Regime fell.  So, Ilhan Omar was taken to Kenya, by her military dad.  She would be there for four years, before receiving the generosity of the United States' asylum program which was a program predominately formed by white males. 

In addition, it's important to note that the famous Sahel Drought of the middle 1980s did NOT touch Somalia.  That drought occurred much further away, in Western Africa ... in Mali, Niger, and Chad.

Therefore, if any of Omar's election campaigners tell you that she had to endure the great famine at the time,  they are completely lying to you, trying to make the Daughter of Genocide out to be a martyr.  She is no martyr.  She's a conniving manipulator who does not know economics, evidenced by the fact that she voted for those two Biden-Era congressional acts which guaranteed the sky-rocketing of Demand Pull Inflation and the burden it was guaranteed to impose upon the working man who keeps Ilhan pampered & protected.

Incidentally, that famine resulted in the fundraising song that became a massive hit, titled "We are the World."  The famine received a lot of news coverage.  Thus, it's very historic.  This means you can read all about it, with little trouble finding literature on it, online.

⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒ ⛒

Concerning the Isaaq Genocide, the "Jew" accusation was merely an excuse to kill off political opponents, in the thousands.  The Isaaqs were targeted, because they supported the Somalia National Movement which was a movement against Dictator Siad Barre.  As a result, the Isaaqs were demonized, much like Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans of today.  None the less, according to the Somalis, it's a crime to be born a Jew.  

Above:  The Muslim Dream Team.  What lovely killers for Allah.   Yes, Allah creates White Christians, so that Muslims can kill them.   Being a Mass Murdering Psychopath is the Holy Holy Way of Allah.

Do not be deceived.  Somalia has been a nation of mass murderers, as well as deadly pirates.  It used to be an agricultural and herder nation, in centuries past.   But, Somalis discovered that there is more money in defrauding the taxpayers of the largest economy in human history, as well as in pirating offshore tankers and luxury liners.

Ilhan has been doing nothing in America, but inciting her own genocide, even if only a political one, against white males ... in a 1] pernicious, 2] manipulative & 3] subtly calculating fashion, of course.  The aforementioned political genocide can be regarded as a proverbial genocide.  But, it will lead to a cultural decimation which is equal to a Cultural Extinction.