Here's the bottom line ... the conclusion ... at the outset. Michael Mann and Democracy Now presented Michael Mann as a Nobel Prize winner, for his work in climatology. This deceives people into thinking that Michael Mann received the Nobel Prize in Physics.
Firstly, he won no type of Nobel Prize. None the less, Mann connects himself with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, otherwise known as the IPCC. HOWEVER, the IPCC won the Nobel PEACE Prize only ... NOT the physics prize. Al Gore co-won this same Peace Prize. Al Gore NEVER won the Nobel Prize in Physics.
There is the recording of a phone call made to the Nobel Prize office, in Scandinavia, to confirm if whether of not Mann is a Nobel Prize winner. The Nobel Prize rep said that Michael Mann definitely is NOT a Nobel Prize winner. Michael Mann is nothing more than a con artists, especially when it comes to his hockey stick graph which I already explained.
In brief review of Mann's hockey stick graph, it claims that 1921 & 1922 were among the coldest years in the past 430 or so years. Newspaper articles of the time, published throughout the modern world, reported 1921 & 1922 as years of extreme heat and extreme Arctic Ice Melt. That fact, alone, invalidates the graph Al Gore used in his extremely fraudulent 2006 movie, on CO2.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *
Audio Proof that Michael Mann's Nobel Prize Claim is a fraudulent misrepresentation (aka lie)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
That particular recording
assures us that Michael Mann is NOT on the list of Nobel Prize sole-winners or co-winners, in any category. So, you do NOT have to submit to him, no matter what he says or writes. And
you surely don't have to submit to the present-day media who
happens to be filled with personnel not known for common sense, honesty,
reason, diligence, ... or humility. BTW, stubbornness is not diligence.
NEITHER has any group affiliated with Michael Mann won or co-won the Nobel prize in Physics ... or in Chemistry ... or in Physiology, aka medicine ... or in Literature ... or in the Economic Sciences.
There is one and only one group which co-won the Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore, in 2007. That was the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Take note that they did NOT win the Nobel Prize in Physics. The Nobel Peace Prize is only one of the several yearly prizes awarded by the Nobel Foundation, and Michael Mann's name is NOT on any of those peace prize awards ... or any other Nobel award.
All in all, Mann is fraudulently passing himself off as the ultimate end-all scientist of his particular field of study which happens to be "surface temperatures."
In addition, he's a notably dull and boring speaker. If you have insomnia, simply go to a Michael Mann talk, and voila! No more insomnia. He makes the End of the World sound all so boring. Therefore, the best thing to wear to a Michael Mann talk is pajamas. Bring a pillow.
The great self-negating feature to Michael Mann ... of the temperature-decline-hider extraordinaire, is something known as evidence. Take notice:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cdbd/9cdbdc86f216b53907e675c577006f27028581cc" alt="https://i0.wp.com/electroverse.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/NYT-1961.gif?ssl=1" |
Above: Introducing ... in printed legacy ... the Temperature Decline that Michael Mann was hiding, yet which was declared to fully exist, by an unanimous field of specialists ... as far back as 1961. |
At
this point, it's also important for you to realize that Al Gore, at best, is a
remedial science student who went on Conan O'Brien's talk show and confidently
stated that the center of Planet Earth is millions of degrees. Try
9,800F to 10,800F, instead. If the core of Planet Earth were millions of
degrees, vaporization & annihilation would have occurred long ago.
BTW, do you remember reading-of or hearing Michael Mann's doomsday predictions about Australia soon becoming a "climate refugee" nation? Well, 2022 was a year of record high crops in East Australia. Also in 2022 was the announcement that two of the three major sectors of the Great Barrier Reef was replenished to the point of having the most coral cover in 36 years.
Michael Mann lied about Australia, probably assuming that Americans are too stupid to find out what's going-on on the other side of the planet. Michael Mann is a protected jerk. One day the protection will suddenly vanish. The puppeteers will cut the strings. For now, stay away from the guy.
https://www.graincentral.com/news/agribusiness/graincorp-posts-record-result-harvest-report/
https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2022/10/green-and-white-australia.html
https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2022/09/great-barrier-reef.html
https://www.bluemarblealbum.com/2022/09/rugged-australian-2022-winter.html
All
in all, Michael Mann is the ultimate Climate Denier in having denied
the existence of the Medieval Warm Period & the Mini-Ice-Age, not to
mention part of the 1940 to 1979 temperature decline, with all of his
"math trick" talent. See: climategate emails.
See: =====> The Climategate Emails w/ introductory narrations. <=====
Now, concerning the 1950s (in part), the '60s (in whole), & the '70s (predominately so), the cooling trend had gotten to the point where England's growing season was shortened by two weeks. No matter what today's lying propagandists publish, it was very cold back then. In fact, as American schoolchildren walked toward their homes, they had to turn around and walk backwards, so that the bitter cold wind would not directly stream down their shirt/blouse collars.
It was assumed at the time that Winters were to be bitterly cold, as a rule. This is why the warming trend of 1983 & 1984 surprised people. In fact, February 1998 was so nice that it scared people, including radio icon Paul Harvey. Then, when the coldest winter in 40 years arrived (in 2014), humanity realized that the climate is cyclical.
See: New York Times, May 21, 1975
Enter Keith Raphael Briffa (1952 - 2017). He was the quintessential tree ring proxy advocate. This means that he was an aficionado in Dendroclimatology. His climate "reconstruction" of the past 1,000 years -- abridged into 600 years -- goes as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3583f/3583f81f95d46cbb5f6230e9d702f24968da8693" alt="https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/briffa_recon.gif" |
The red section above is what Mann was praised for hiding, in the Climategate emails.
|
Below: Look at the YELLOW LINE, toward the right side of the predominately blue graph. Look closely at the "0.0C" temperature anomaly X-axis. If the Briffa reconstruction were not deleted, Michael Mann could not have drawn a steeply upward sloping line to represent drastic warming.
Now, the Y-axis scale on the chart below is not remarkable, because the whole chart involves no more than 1.5 degree Celsius in variability. Thus, the chart only deals with small increases or decreases in the temperature anomaly (aka temperature changes.) Using smaller increments exaggerates the slope of a graph and serves to deceive people, instead of enlightening them. It makes that which is little look much more pronounced than it really is.
BELOW: Look at the Briffa Reconstruction again, in a more clear view. It's based on tree ring density only. The Briffa line is green and it starts at the Year 1400 or so.
As far as goes Mann, he has two lines on that graph. The thinner line is dark blue and it doesn't begin until 1580. That was ever-so-coincidentally after the great heatwave & drought of 1540. None the less, that thinner dark blue line only involves temperatures from Latitude 30N to 70N. This means that it does NOT involve global temperatures. After all, no southern hemispheric temperatures are involved, and no northern tropical temperatures are involved.
The Tropics are 23.5 degrees latitude, north & south. Yet, Michael Mann's math doesn't begin until the 30th parallel north. Welcome to Michael Mann's real math trick. It's the trick where you leave numbers out of the equation.
The other line of Mann, the black one, involves all Northern Hemispheric temps from 1000 C.E to 2000 C.E. However, it's the dark blue "30N-70N" line which is the one able to hide the decline.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac504/ac50446644a8f3cedcc5916f7d6794c9b583e9ea" alt="https://camirror.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/fig2-212.gif"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99b85/99b85217168595774f5ef3fc3cd1621ca735df7a" alt="https://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/briffa_versions.gif"
Note that the slope of the temperature decline was very pronounced. So, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change simply cut off the decline at the Year 1960. Then came Michael Mann and his bag of tricks. The disappearing act ensued.
The MBH Hockey Stick Graph--- was never test driven or tested for cracks. (M=Mann, B=Bradley, H=Hughes)
Michael Mann, Decline Hider Extraordinaire, never revealed the data sets that he used to justify the
drawing of his asininely ridiculous hockey stick climate graph. Thus, he never justified why he deleted the historically known Medieval Warm Period and the very well chronicled Mini Ice
Age.
Rumor had it that Mann dropped the use of proxy evidence as soon as it showed a decline in surface temperatures. He then included thermostat stats, in its place. This is the act of mixing apples with oranges.
The
irony to that graph was that it was a straight declining line for 1,000
years, by a half degree, as if Climate were in a perpetually stagnate
coffin, except for handful of upticks. One uptick on his very fraudulent graph was during the Wolf Minimum. Oops. He denied the Little Ice Age at its historic beginning.
The Wolf Minimum came in 1280 and preceded the Great Plague of 1348. The Great Plague is often regarded as the start of the Mini Ice Age. Actually, 1280 C.E. can be regarded as the start of the 550 year age of Ice Dominance.
None the less, the Briffa reconstruction had temperatures that were higher at the start of the 20th century. Thus, the real decline was a sharper downward slope. Mann decided to make the slope much more gradual. This meant that, according to Michael Mann, there are no
natural mechanisms to create weather variations on an upward temperature
trend more than half a degree. According to Mann, upward trends can only be accomplished by the use of the combustible engine. Yet, drastic weather changes occurred throughout history ... long before the invention of the combustible engine and the Mack Truck.
Well,
there were a number of climate change scenarios in the past 4,000
years, when there were no combustible engines or coal power plants. In
some cases, there weren't even chariots. Michael Mann's graph is an
insult to
human intelligence. Well, all of Michael Mann is an insult to human
intelligence ... not merely his hockey stick graph.
During
the Renaissance Era Ice Age, there were still occasional
warm Summers and hot days throughout that time. One example was the
June 28, 1778 Battle of Monmouth which involved 25,000 troops. It was fought in present-day Freehold New Jersey. That was
a huge number of soldiers for the American Revolutionary War. The June 1778 battle
ended with the British withdrawing its troops at night, incidentally.
In
addition, there were droughts during those centuries, including the
1540s Tudor Drought. There were catastrophic hurricanes, too, even
though the atmospheric co2 count was very low, when compared to today.
As an example, 1780 was a catastrophic year with hurricane damage
being its highlight. One hurricane killed 22,000 people, in 1780.
The 2nd most asinine thing Michael Mann ever said in front of a camera.
Michael
Mann was asked how much CO2 must be removed from the atmosphere. Mann
confidently said, "Half the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in ten
years," ... in order
to prevent a 1.5C catastrophic temperature rise. Stop there. That
spoken line shows that Mann either knows nothing about the new findings
in atmospheric physics or he is just not thinking when he talks.
Proxy
history showed that not even a 2C rise is catastrophic, but rather, a 2C
rise accompanied the rise of the great & historic Roman Empire. For
the record, it was scientifically & professionally surmised, via
Mediterranean proxy material, that the Roman Warm Period was TWO degrees
CELSIUS warmer than it is today.
Plus, the temperature rise helped the Romans
finally conquer the hard hitting Gaul army of Chieftain Vercingetorix, in an eight year-long war --- in
a land known as present-day France. Thus, a 1.5C rise in surface temperature is NOT anywhere near
catastrophic.
For
the record, the Gauls used to terrorize Italy ... demand tribute, take
Italian gold, etc. So, Julius decided to stop the terror attacks and
bring back to Italy the Roman gold that had Vercingetorix's fingerprints
on it.
None
the less, here is the supreme asininity of that one Michael Mann
assertion, concerning deleting half the CO2 from the atmosphere:
{1}
Half of today's level of co2 = 210 parts per million (ppm). That
constitutes 50 ppm LESS THAN during cave-man days. That constitutes 73
ppm LESS THAN the start of the 19th Century, aka the Napoleonic Era. Both time periods occurred
when the human population was much smaller than today.
See for yourself: ***> Atmospheric CO2 graph, starting at 1800 <***
{2a}
Today's population is 8 BILLION in human beings, meaning that much
more
crop harvesting is needed today than during the Napoleonic War Years
when the world population was approximately 1 billion. Thus, much more
CO2 is needed today, and coincidentally
enough, the atmosphere is presently providing the extra needed amount of
CO2
for our era.
{2b}
CO2 is the KEY to PHOTOSYNTHESIS. When CO2 goes below 150 ppm, all
photosynthesis halts. Life on Earth soon follows suit. Dropping the CO2 count to 210 ppm is irresponsible.
{2c}
NASA has already reported on the added greening of the present-day Arctic Circle
during the Summer months. Extra CO2 increases photosynthesis throughout
the Earth. In as much, IF you want to "go green," the first thing that
you have to do is INCREASE THE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 LEVEL. Growers do this
to their greenhouses, as a rule.
See: NASA's Satellite Technology shows the greening of the Earth
NASA reports a greener Earth of recent
CO2 levels making Earth Greener
Added co2 and added plant growth demonstration
The
asininity of Michael Mann and his fellow racketeer, Al Gore, is that
they are doing the opposite of what it takes to "go green." This
anti-co2 mindset is the Supreme Asininity of the climate doomsayers.
In as much, pursuant to the NY Times vs Sullivan case law authority, I, a private citizen, state my opinion of public figure, Michael Mann:
Michael
Mann is a contrived fad. He's an artificially propped-up mouthpiece,
presented as the wisdom of the ages.
Mann
is only famous, because of the hockey stick graph. Yet, he never
showed the public
the data sets upon which his neon-lighted hockey stick climate graph
came to be. He could have made up that graph as much as some people
made-up record breaking high temperatures in those parts of Africa which
had NO WEATHER MONITORING STATIONS.
Thus,
the one hockey stick graph which made Mann a contrived
news show icon has never been tested for cracks. It has never been
test-driven. Would you buy a car you never test-drove? Of course not.
So, we the People of the United States do NOT buy Michael Mann's
untested climate change hockey stick graph.
This
is especially true for those of us who worked outdoors, year after
year, and decade after decade. This is because we are experienced
enough to know that ====> Climate is cyclical.
Plus,
Michael Mann has a very financial conflict of interest in the promotion
of his hockey stick graph which omits the historically supported Mini-Ice-Age
which included:
{1a}
the great frosts, great floods, crop failures & mass starvation
often mentioned in the Bristol Chronicles.
{1b}, the Sporer Solar Minimum
which has now been concluded to have actually existed from the starting
point of 1460 C.E.
{2}
The irony & counter-intuitive hot year of 1540, followed by the
cold account of 1640, in showing how Mann's virtual straight-lined graph
needed more spikes in it, to reflect historic climate reality.
{3} The North American drought year of 1580, showing more of the need of upward spikes in the Mann Hockey Stick graph.
{4} The Grindelwald Fluctuation of 1560 - 1630, which even included out-of-season snowfalls.
{5} The well-known Maunder Solar Minimum which included warm Summers, in addition to ice-ridden Winters.
{6} The Dalton Solar Minimum of 1790 - 1830 which included the 1816 Summer That Never Was.
All in all, the "Mann, Bradley, & Hughes" graph is typically Orwellian, in that it rewrites history.
Why
don't the
newscasters ask Michael Mann how much personal money he personally made
since the publishing of his hockey stick graph? Why doesn't Michael
Mann simply come out and let us Americans know how much currency was
transacted into his financial portfolio in the form of
taxpayer dollars?
None
the less, for the past 4,000 years, climate change has literally been
occurring every 124 to 600 years. Climate is a long-term roller
coaster ride. Climate is cyclical.
Ah, yes. Michael Mann. Hiding the Decline Since 1999.
Michael
Mann proved himself to be utterly heartless, if not an indifferent
psychopath, against an elderly retired Air Force pilot, on account of
the pilot saying that, even though Michael Mann was teaching at Penn
State, he should have been at the State pen (penitentiary), instead. One sentence was spoken, and a
ridiculous amount of Canadian civil lawsuit attorney fees ensued.
The
retired & elderly pilot who earned a doctorate degree let me know how
much suffering Mann put him through, and he informed me that he
intended to let the world know about those sufferings after the lawsuit
ended. Well, the lawsuit ended. There was
no communication between me and the Canadian gentleman since I left
Chicago, in 2019. He recently passed-on into eternity. His videos are his legacy.
And remember, pursuant to NY Times vs Sullivan,
a private citizen may publicly state his opinion of a public figure, in the United States.
I'll be politely reserved for now. I only stated half of my opinion
thus far.
It
suffices to state that some people in this world are really sick jokes,
and for long periods of relative time, it appears that they will get
away with every wrong they have ever performed. But, appearances are not all what they appear to be. History repeats itself.
Do
the math on this one ... on the person who caused schoolchildren dread,
and who caused gasoline prices to skyrocket, in his role as an advisor to the Dementia-ridden president. The same person caused an elderly former air force
pilot the loss of his life savings and the gain of accompanying dread. Justice, in
the end, prevails.
For
now, be like a charming Latin gentleman, even if you hate us
Latins to the marrow of our beings. Do NOT write to Michael Mann. Only
address his superiors and the Court of Public Opinion, as well as a
RICO court. Do NOT walk up to Michael Mann in a restaurant. Let him have a relaxing time. Do NOT picket in
front of his house, his office, etc. Be as charming as a Ricardo
Montalban. Charm doesn't hurt anyone. Meanwhile, simply boycott Michael Mann.
The
goal is to see to it that humanity clearly sees that Michael Mann and
the less than brilliant Al Gore have been lying, in sleight-of-hand
deceit, all along. In order to achieve this goal, it is NOT necessary
to harass anyone in a restaurant or to picket in front of a domicile.
People like Michael Mann are necessary to avoid, because he's a liar who
will claim that you threatened him, if you get anywhere close to him
... or he will tell some lie about you. So, stay away from Hockey
Sticks Mann. Simply boycott him.
Sincerely,
Private US Citizen #40,801,958.
There is a meaning to that number